ABSTRACT
In order to find out appropriate model to best disseminate laparoscopy for colorectal cancer clinical advanced technologies,it is necessary to establish a whole set of training system,which included selecting training site,intensive training,operation observation,advanced study at home and abroad,technical support,etc..Evaluation was based on operation time,hemorrhage in surgery,other injuries in surgery,conversion to open surgery and the ratio of in situ relapse in one year post surgery.These five indexes were compared between the training group and the control group with the gradually stable trend of learning curve as standard.Without previous laparoscopic surgery experience,the training group required 13.8±0.75,14±0.89,10.2±0.74,16.4±0.49 and 20.4±0.49 cases,respectively,to achieve expected proficiency,and the control group required 28.6± 1.69,29.2±1.16,27.8 ± 0.74,22.8 ± 0.40 and 25.4± 1.03 cases,respectively.The learning time required 13.4± 1.02 months on average for the training group and 27.8±2.13 months for the control group.In conclusion,the training system achieved obvious superiority to the controls to achieve expected skills and proficiency in laparoscopy for colorectal cancer.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the clinic application effects of laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of abdominal difficult and complicated diseases.Methods The clinical data of 64 cases of agnogenic abdominal diseases underwent laparoscopic exploration and biopsies were retrospectively analyzed.All the patients were difficult cases to diagnose,who have one or more clinical situations,such as abdominal pain,ascites of unknown origin,abdominal mass and intestinal obstruction,and obscure hemorrhage of small intestine.Results Definite diagnosis was made in 62 patients after laparoscopy (96.9％).In patients with ascites,abdominal mass,intestinal obstruction and hemorrhage of small intestine,the definite diagnostic rate were 93.3％,100.0％,100.0％ and 6/6,respectively.The complication rate of laparoscopic exploration was 1.6％ (1/64).Underwent laparoscopic exploration,14 of 64 cases (22％) were treated by operation.Among them,8 cases (8/14) were treated by therapeutic laparoscopy,and other 6 cases (6/14) were treated by abdominal surgery without any comliactions.Conclusion Laparoscopic exploration is safe and effective in diagnosis and treatment of abdominal difficult and complicated diseases.
ABSTRACT
A new type of gastric electrical stimulator (GES) was introduced. After the stimulator was implanted in beagle dogs, its stimulating effects and the pathological changes at the implant site were observed to study the safety and efficacy of stimulator as well as the tissue compatibility of the materials used. The results showed that, this type of stimulator was safe and capable of inhibiting food intake of the dogs, and that the materials used had good tissue compatibility.
Subject(s)
Animals , Dogs , Female , Electric Stimulation , Methods , Electrodes, Implanted , Histocompatibility , Stomach , PhysiologyABSTRACT
Objective The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of EUS in rectal cancer restaging after neoadjuvant therapy. Methods EUS staging was performed after neoadjuvant therapy in 61 patients who were diagnosed as having local advanced rectal cancer. All patients underwent subsequent surgi-cal resection and complete pathologic staging. Results Compared with pathological staging, the total accura-cy of post-therapy EUS T-staging was 59.0% (36/61). The T-overstaging rate was 36.1% (22/61) and un-derstaging rate was 4.9% (3/61). Accuracy of EUS N-staging was 68.9% (42/61), N-overstaging and un-derstaging rates were 14.7% (9/61) and 16.4% (10/61), respectively. Conclusion The accuracy of EUS restaging for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy is relatively low.